

Lattice Diamond is the next generation replacement for ispLEVER featuring design exploration, ease of use, improved design flow, and numerous additional enhancements.
#Synplify pro rom inferencing software
Lattice Diamond design software offers leading-edge design and implementation tools optimized for cost sensitive, low-power Lattice FPGA architectures.
#Synplify pro rom inferencing full
Full Tcl scripting support is provided with interactive help features.

Add, change, or remove entire sets of constraints, power voltages, or debug access easily with a mouse click.These are the "recipes" needed to complete your design, and they can be saved and shared easily. Strategies contain all the tool settings used within an implementation.One Lattice Diamond project does the work that normally requires multiple projects in other tools. Supports VHDL, Verilog, EDIF, schematics and multiple implementations.Diamond provides several unique features that make exploring design alternatives easy: Lattice Diamond allows easy exploration of alternate solutions without resorting to workarounds like multiple projects or different revisions. Input from someone versed in SystemVerilog will be very welcome.Overview Exploring Design Alternatives Made Easyįinding the best solutions for smaller FPGAs often requires evaluating multiple alternatives. And I don't know enough of SystemVerilog to make the right choice so I tend to go for 1.b. But unfortunately things may be not so clear cut as some vendor may say it supports 2001, which in theory supports multidimensional arrays, but restrict this to the (basic) memory declaration like: reg mema. where we constrain the output to SystemVerilog if we detect features which are not supported in Verilog 2001. I have no good idea whether forcing people to switch to SytemVerilog, by producing only. In the m1D branch I only test if the target standard is greater then or equal to 'SV2005' to find out whether packed arrays are preferred. We probably best restrict ourselves to SV2005. standard attribute in _toVerilog and got overboard with adding versions, I admit, but I already hinted the choices could/should be reduced. If you say switches are you referring to command line switches or to the likes of _ toVHLD.std_logic_ports?
